NSP · PROTOTYPE
กำลังโหลด…
LOADING
PUBLIC TV FUNDING · FOUR COUNTRIES
Japan and Germany charge every household by law. France abolished the household fee in 2022 and is running out of money. The only model that takes nothing from the viewer is the one nobody has proved is affordable.
- HOUSEHOLD CHARGE
- ฿0 – ฿8,321
- per year, across the four models
- WITHOUT ONE
- 1 of 4
- France, since 2022
- IN DEFICIT
- 3 of 4
- NHK, BBC and France all report one
WHAT THE HOUSEHOLD PAYS, PER YEAR
- France France Télévisions฿0
€0 — was €0.99/month before abolition
- Japan NHK฿2,642
¥12,276/yr terrestrial · ¥21,765/yr with satellite
- United Kingdom BBC฿4,543
£180.00/yr from 1 Apr 2026
- Germany ARD / ZDF / Deutschlandradio฿8,321
€18.36/month = €220.32/yr
Converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Oct 2026 (1 USD = ฿33.745). A spot rate, used only so one bar can be read against another on this page — not a restatement of any broadcaster's accounts.
THE MECHANISM, AND WHETHER THE VIEWER CAN SAY NO
France · France Télévisions
Household fee abolished 2022. Funded by a state endowment and a temporary contribution levied on large online platforms.
- PAID BY
- Platforms + state
- OPT-OUT
- yes
- ADVERTISING
- Retained, and being withdrawn from the domestic channels.
≈ ฿115.6bn
€3.06bn turnover (2025) · net −€30.7m · 8,720 staff · state holds 100% of capital
Japan · NHK
Receiving-fee contract required by law. Broadcast Law Article 64 binds every owner of a reception device, including phones and computers, regardless of nationality.
- PAID BY
- Every household
- OPT-OUT
- no — statutory
- ADVERTISING
- None. No advertising revenue line exists in the consolidated accounts.
≈ ฿143.3bn revenue
¥665,970m ordinary revenue · ¥595,803m of it licence fee (89.4%) · ¥699,202m expenditure · ordinary balance −¥33,232m
United Kingdom · BBC
TV licence collected by the BBC and commercially by TVLC under contract. £180.00 per year from 1 April 2026 (£174.50 from April 2025).
- PAID BY
- Every household
- OPT-OUT
- no — statutory
- ADVERTISING
- No advertising on UK BBC channels. International selling only, through BBC Commercial.
≈ ฿150.5bn revenue
£5,962m group revenue · £3,879m licence fee · group deficit £121m, a third consecutive year · 23.3m licences in force, down from 23.8m
Germany · ARD / ZDF / Deutschlandradio
Rundfunkbeitrag — a flat contribution per dwelling, €18.36 per month since July 2020. Set by the Länder in a Staatsvertrag; any change needs all 16 state parliaments.
- PAID BY
- Every dwelling
- OPT-OUT
- no — statutory
- ADVERTISING
- None on ARD or ZDF.
≈ ฿403bn/yr
2025–2028 need: ARD €30,343.7m + ZDF €11,160.7m + Deutschlandradio €1,151.2m = €42,655.6m
WHAT EACH ONE SAYS ABOUT ITSELF
France
The only model here that takes nothing from the viewer. It is also the one under the most financial pressure: the platform contribution was explicitly written as temporary and legally obliged to change by 2025. Free to the public here is not the same as settled.
France Télévisions consolidated accounts 2025; loi de finances rectificative 2022, Conseil constitutionnel 12 Aug 2022
Japan
Free to watch and compulsory to pay. What NHK proves is that a broadcaster of this scale can run with no advertising at all, and that the fee can be collected at the point of sale rather than by subscription. What it also proves is that the fee model has a collection problem: ¥5,615m was written off in FY2024.
NHK consolidated accounts FY2024 (1 Apr 2024 – 31 Mar 2025); NHK official receiving-fee table, snapshot 13 Dec 2024
United Kingdom
The clearest evidence that a licence-fee broadcaster is not a blank cheque. The BBC states in its own accounts that its fee income "remains insufficient to sustain a universal public service". Any claim that a state platform is cheap should be tempered by this.
BBC Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26; TV Licence Fee Trust Statement (licence fee £180.00 from 1 Apr 2026)
Germany
The most expensive household charge of the four, and it is already failing to cover the need: the KEF has recommended a rise from €18.36 to €18.64 for January 2027. A 2024 rise was blocked by the state premiers. The legal ruling that let it survive is the useful part — the fee is sustainable while programme plurality is real.
KEF 25th Report, Table 1 (Finanzbedarf 2025–2028); ARD/ZDF/Deutschlandradio
WHICH OF THESE THAILAND IS ACTUALLY PROPOSING
None of the four, exactly. The USO fund in Thailand is a levy collected on the sector — the 2026 collection rate is 2.5% — which makes it structurally closest to the Broadcasting Development Fund in Korea, and least like NHK or the German contribution, because no household signs anything.
That is a genuine advantage and it should be claimed as one: a public channel that nobody is forced to pay for, funded by the industry that competes for the same attention. It is also the model with the weakest published accounting, because the sector levy is exactly where the state has never had to justify a number to a household.
The honest limit. No total public cost for the Thai platform has ever been published — not by the regulator, not by its office, not by any critic. The ฿200m figure that circulates is a build cost only, and the operating cost recurs forever. A comparison page that put a ฿200m next to NHK's ¥666bn would be comparing a build price with a running cost, and it would be wrong.